12 January 2010

Silence

Back in April I was astounded to read the scientific paper,
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen.

doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007.

I made a short post about it (Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe); simply drawing it to the attention of the very few people who may happen to stumble across the blog.

At the end of the post I expressed the opinion that it would be interesting to see how this work would be received.

I suppose I've got my answer.

Silence.

As far as I can tell the paper has been ignored.

I don't know what to say ... evidence supporting one of the many competing hypotheses surrounding a catastrophic event simply ... ignored.

Anyway, if you want to make some of your own nano-thermite, reference 19 from the paper leads to,

Making Nanostructured Pyrotechnics In A Beaker by A E Gash, R L Simpson, T M Tillotson, J H Satcher, and L W Hrubesh. However, in order to make sufficient quantities to destroy a building, plant and equipment would be required (perhaps along the lines of ...).
Update 5th March 2011. The nanothermite paper has been destroyed by Prof D Rancourt. For details see Editor in Chief resigned over the Harrit et al. nanothermite paper

4 comments:

  1. "As far as I can tell the paper has been ignored."


    Try Googling "9 11 thermite". For an added frisson, include the word "conspiracy" in yr search terms.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi sam_m,

    googling 911 thermite lists the usual truthers

    No MSM comments. No backpedalling on policy by govs. No revision of the official narrative.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you question "the official narrative" you are one of "the usual truthers".

    So, " Ever had the feeling that you've been cheated? "

    ReplyDelete
  4. In answer to your question, yes; daily.

    There appears to be a huge anomaly in the official narrative; yet, the policies which are derived from and are based on the official narrative are being carried out. Carried out on a daily basis.

    So, yes, I get the feeling that I've been cheated.

    ReplyDelete