Grainger v Nicholson is discussed in an employment law blog where they provide a link (word doc) to the court case.
As has been well reported, man-made global warming, in law, can be regarded as a philosophical belief (subject to factual tests) for the purposes of Article 9 of the ECHR.
Curiously, according Burton J, "Darwinism must plainly be capable of being a philosophical belief, albeit that it may be based entirely on scientific conclusions (not all of which may be uncontroversial)."
I make no particular points in this post ... the judgment is simply of interest.
New Photos, Same Blather
6 hours ago

No comments:
Post a Comment