He goes on to say, "[t]hey [the earlier authorities] seem to me to point to a very reasonable principle that if through no fault of his own a person gets mixed up in the tortious acts of others so as to facilitate their wrong-doing he may incur no personal liability but he comes under a duty to assist the person who has been wronged by giving him full information and disclosing the identity of the wrongdoers. I do not think that it matters whether he became so mixed up by voluntary action on his part or because it was his duty to do what he did. It may be that if this causes him expense the person seeking the information ought to reimburse him. But justice requires that he should co-operate in righting the wrong if he unwittingly facilitated its perpetration."
Adding, "... [i]f the Respondents have any doubts in any future case about the propriety of making disclosures they are well entitled to require the matter to be submitted to the Court at the expense of the person seeking the disclosure. The Court will then only order discovery if satisfied that there is no substantial chance of injustice being done."
Reading the Mohamed judgement at the moment and being a chemist; one can't but help but think of the chemical compound in the Norwich Pharmacal case.
Image produced courtesy of Daylight by posting the SMILES string into their depict facility.
smiles string O=N(=O)C1=CC=C(O1)C=NN2CCOC2(=O)
smiles string O=N(=O)C1=CC=C(O1)C=NN2CCOC2(=O)
Patent GB735,136, thanks to Dave.

0 comments:
Post a Comment